USPS

Ryan Harter v. USPS

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202221-35129California1,070 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 23 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RYAN HARTER, No. 21-35129

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00161-RMP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE;

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF

LETTER CARRIERS, AFL-CIO,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 8, 2022** Seattle, Washington

Before: BYBEE, BEA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Ryan Harter appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to

the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) on his duty-of-fair-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). representation claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

Harter argues on appeal that NALC breached the duty of fair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.