James Erwin v. Michael Ramos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202220-55903California605 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAMES HOWARD ERWIN, No. 20-55903

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 5:18-cv-00420-JGB-SHK v. 5:18-cv-01216-JGB-SHK

MICHAEL A. RAMOS, in his individual capacity; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees,

and

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 14, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. James Erwin appeals from the district court’s decision granting the

defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this action under 42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.