Guillermo Magdaleno-Chavez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202215-73381California819 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUILLERMO MAGDALENO-CHAVEZ, No. 15-73381

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-319-757

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Guillermo Magdaleno-Chavez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro

se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his request for a

continuance and his applications for cancellation of removal, asylum, withholding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our

jurisdiction is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.