Guillermo Lainez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202218-71588California375 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUILLERMO ERNESTO LAINEZ, No. 18-71588

Petitioner, Agency No. A072-516-441

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Guillermo Ernesto Lainez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). questions of law. Pechenkov v. Holder, 705 F.3d 444, 449 (9th Cir. 2012). We

dismiss in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.