Guadalupe Sandoval v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 202219-72292California940 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 23 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUADALUPE ALBERTO SANDOVAL, No. 19-72292

Petitioner, Agency No. A089-664-981

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Guadalupe Sandoval (“Sandoval”), a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. dismissing his appeal of the denial of his application for cancellation of removal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.