Pollard

INTRODUCTION

Appellants Farley Pollard and Chelsea Pollard (appellants) appeal from the judgment on the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of respondents Nicholas Abramovic and Katja Grosch (respondents). On appeal, appellants argue: 1) the trial court’s ruling “assumed facts not in evidence as the exhibits upon which [respondents] based its motion for summary judgment were distorted and did not support their argument of accord and satisfaction”; and 2) “the exhibits that were not distorted do not support the granting of [respondents’] Motion for Summary Judgment as a matter of law.” We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Civil Complaint On May 10, 2018, appellants filed a civil complaint against respondents jointly and severally for damages arising out of an automobile accident. The complaint alleged that on February 9, 2017, respondent Abramovic drove through a red light and collided with appellants’ vehicle, injuring them. At the time, Abramovic was allegedly under the influence of alcohol. Respondent Grosch was the passenger in and owner of the vehicle Abramovic drove. Abramovic was subsequently arrested for driving under the…