People v. Calzada CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant James Calzada appeals after the trial court found
defendant in violation of his parole supervision. Counsel has filed a brief under the
authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386
U.S. 738, requesting this court to conduct an independent review of the record. In
addition, defendant has had an opportunity to file a supplemental brief with this court and
has not done so. We find no error and affirm the judgment.
II.
BACKGROUND
In September 2012, defendant was convicted of possession or manufacture of a 1 deadly weapon by a prisoner in violation of Penal Code section 4502, subdivision
(a)(1).{CT 4, 8} At the time, defendant was incarcerated in state prison following his
conviction for rape by force or fear (§ 261, subd. (a)) in March 2005.{CT 5, 8}
Defendant was paroled from state prison on January 28, 2019 on various terms and
conditions of his parole. Defendant’s parole was scheduled to expire or terminate on
May 5, 2022.{CT 4, 6}
After defendant violated the terms and conditions of his parole by absconding
from parole supervision and removing his electronic global positioning system…