People v. Calzada CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2022E078097California1,083 words

Opinion

Opinion

I.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant James Calzada appeals after the trial court found

defendant in violation of his parole supervision. Counsel has filed a brief under the

authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386

U.S. 738, requesting this court to conduct an independent review of the record. In

addition, defendant has had an opportunity to file a supplemental brief with this court and

has not done so. We find no error and affirm the judgment.

II.

BACKGROUND

In September 2012, defendant was convicted of possession or manufacture of a 1 deadly weapon by a prisoner in violation of Penal Code section 4502, subdivision

(a)(1).{CT 4, 8} At the time, defendant was incarcerated in state prison following his

conviction for rape by force or fear (§ 261, subd. (a)) in March 2005.{CT 5, 8}

Defendant was paroled from state prison on January 28, 2019 on various terms and

conditions of his parole. Defendant’s parole was scheduled to expire or terminate on

May 5, 2022.{CT 4, 6}

After defendant violated the terms and conditions of his parole by absconding

from parole supervision and removing his electronic global positioning system…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.