Baral

Baral v. Schnitt CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2022B298050MCalifornia6,217 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

Filed 2/24/22 Baral v. Schnitt CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

ROBERT C. BARAL, B298050

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC475350) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

DAVID SCHNITT, AND DENYING REHEARING

Defendant and Appellant. [CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 28, 2022, be modified as follows: 1. On page 2, the last sentence of the second full paragraph is deleted and the following is inserted in its place: Accordingly, we affirm the order awarding Schnitt anti-SLAPP fees but vacate the judgment as to Baral’s causes of action for fraud and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.