Trinidad Martinez-Espindola v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202220-72133California771 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 24 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRINIDAD MARTINEZ-ESPINDOLA, No. 20-72133

Petitioner, Agency No. A208-967-399

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ADELMAN,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation. Petitioner Trinidad Martinez-Espindola (Petitioner) is a native and citizen of

Mexico. He seeks review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals

(BIA) dismissing his appeal from the denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.