Martin Sarksian v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202217-70276California861 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN SARKSIAN, No. 17-70276

Petitioner, Agency No. A078-528-835

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and GLEASON,*** District Judge.

Martin Sarksian petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Sarksian made

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sharon L. Gleason, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. an untimely motion to reopen based on allegedly changed country conditions in

Armenia. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.