Marc Endsley v. State of California
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARC ANTHONY LOWELL ENDSLEY, No. 21-55202 AKA Marc Endsley, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-03091-UA-SS Plaintiff-Appellant,
and MEMORANDUM*
DARYL CARRUTHERS; TIMOTHY
McWHORTER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Marc Anthony Lowell Endsley appeals pro se from the district court’s order
rejecting his habeas petition on the basis of a vexatious litigant order. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the
district…