Dirk Bouie v. R. Willox

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DIRK JA'ONG BOUIE, No. 20-17168

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-00624-JAM-AC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

R. WILLOX; V. WIHLIDAL, Deputy

District Attorney; FIELDER, Correctional Counselor,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Dirk Ja’ong Bouie appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191…