Damon Williams v. Kelly Laimana
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202221-55053California411 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS, No. 21-55053
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:20-cv-01110-DOC-ADS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
KELLY LAIMANA; BEST WESTERN
INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Respondents-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Damon Charles Williams appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in
his petition to confirm an arbitration award. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291 and 9 U.S.C. § 16. We review de novo a district court’s decision to vacate
an arbitration award. Lagstein v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 607
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…