Chimyere McCall v. Damon Williams
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHIMYERE McCALL; MONROE No. 21-15638 McCALL, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05126-SMB Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v. MEMORANDUM*
DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant,
ZENE WILLIAMS,
Counter-claimant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Damon Charles Williams and Zene Williams appeal pro se from the district
court’s judgment in Chimyere and Monroe McCall’s diversity action. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s
summary judgment. Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d…