Chimyere McCall v. Damon Williams

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202221-15638California320 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHIMYERE McCALL; MONROE No. 21-15638 McCALL, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05126-SMB Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. MEMORANDUM*

DAMON CHARLES WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant,

ZENE WILLIAMS,

Counter-claimant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Damon Charles Williams and Zene Williams appeal pro se from the district

court’s judgment in Chimyere and Monroe McCall’s diversity action. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

summary judgment. Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.