Carlos Canchola-Juarez v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 202219-72717California462 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS CANCHOLA-JUAREZ, No. 19-72717
Petitioner, Agency No. A206-784-664
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Carlos Canchola-Juarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying a motion to remand
and dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his
application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to remand.