McMillin
McMillin v. Eare
Opinion
Opinion
Stratton, J.
Filed 2/23/22 (unmodified opn. attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
SHARON MCMILLIN, B298990
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NC060255) v.
ORDER
SOM RATHMENY EARE,
Defendant and Appellant;
JOSHUA NATHAN MCMILLIN,
Defendant and Respondent.
The parties’ joint motion filed February 17, 2022, to recall the remittitur and modify the opinion is granted. The remittitur, filed December 29, 2021, is recalled for the purpose of modifying the opinion to correct a clerical error. While the general rule is that an appellate court loses all control and jurisdiction over a cause after the remittitur has been issued (Rare Coin Galleries, Inc. v. A-Mark Coin Co., Inc. (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 330, 336), on a party’s or its own motion and for good cause, the court may order recall of a remittitur (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.272(c)(2)). The recall may be ordered for the correction of clerical error or on the ground of fraud, mistake, or inadvertence. (Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal Com. (1982) 33 Cal.3d 158, 165.)…