People v. Woodson CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 2022A162313California2,576 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/25/22 P. v. Woodson CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A162313

v. (City & County of San Francisco QUINNTEZ WOODSON, Super. Ct. Nos. SCN231371,

CT19007515)

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Quinntez Woodson appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to strike a three-year firearm enhancement imposed under Penal Code section 12022.5, subdivision (a).1 He contends the trial court abused its discretion by failing to give adequate consideration to mitigating factors that justified striking the enhancement in the interest of justice. We conclude the trial court’s decision was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.