In re Frank O. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
In this dependency case, the juvenile court found jurisdiction over the three
children based upon allegations that the parents had substance abuse issues; failed to
provide them with adequate care and shelter; and failed to provide them with necessary
medical and dental treatment. Appellant, Veronica C. (Mother), appeals from the
jurisdictional and dispositional orders. She challenges only the court’s finding that she
had a current substance abuse problem that placed the children at risk of harm within the
meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b)(1). 1 Mother also
challenges a dispositional order requiring her to participate in an outpatient substance
abuse program. Father did not separately appeal.
We exercise our discretion to consider Mother’s challenge. We disagree with
Mother and conclude that substantial evidence supports the juvenile court’s finding she
had a current substance abuse problem and that there was a substantial risk of harm to the
children. We also disagree that the juvenile court abused its discretion when it ordered
Mother to participate in a drug treatment program. For the reasons below, we affirm…