United States v. Gary Christensen

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-15515

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:20-cv-08152-DGC-1 3:14-cr-08164-DGC-1 v.

GARY S. CHRISTENSEN, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Gary S. Christensen appeals pro se from the district court’s orders granting

in part and denying in part his petition for a writ of error coram nobis, and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Because we agree with the district court that Christensen has not shown an error

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…