Rodolfo Hernandez-Mijangos v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202221-70777California441 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODOLFO EDENILSON HERNANDEZ- No. 21-70777 MIJANGOS; et al., Agency No. A209-999-474 Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 9, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. Rodolfo Hernandez-Mijangos, his wife, and their three minor children,

natives and citizens of El Salvador, seek review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing their appeal from an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.