Roberto Ramirez-Pineda v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202220-73363California622 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERTO ANTONIO RAMIREZ- No. 20-73363

PINEDA,

Agency No. A078-461-089 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 9, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. Roberto Ramirez-Pineda, a native and citizen of El Salvador, seeks review

of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal from the

order of an Immigration Judge (IJ) that denied his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.