Sfpd
Peter Vu v. Sfpd
Opinion
facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021,
1030 (9th Cir. 2013) (“To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for a violation of
the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment a plaintiff must show
that the defendants acted with an intent or purpose to discriminate against the
plaintiff based upon membership in a protected class.” (citation and internal
quotation marks omitted)); Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010)
(although pro se pleadings are construed liberally, a plaintiff must allege facts
sufficient to state a plausible claim).
AFFIRMED.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
21-15619