Lam Quan v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202221-15416California946 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 25 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAM VI QUAN, No. 21-15416

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08118-LB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 12, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: BOGGS,** OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Lam Vi Quan appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition for habeas corpus, which challenged his continued detention during

the pendency of his immigration removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a). Reviewing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.