John Miller v. S. Acosta

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202220-55879California659 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

FEB 25 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN L. MILLER, No. 20-55879

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-02285-GW-KK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

S. ACOSTA; E. HENRY; S. LOPEZ,

individual; ABDUL WAHAB OMEIRA, individual,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner John L. Miller appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the

First and Fourteenth Amendments arising out of Miller’s participation in the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Religious Meat Alternative (“RMA”) diet program. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.