John Miller v. S. Acosta
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202220-55879California659 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
FEB 25 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN L. MILLER, No. 20-55879
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-02285-GW-KK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
S. ACOSTA; E. HENRY; S. LOPEZ,
individual; ABDUL WAHAB OMEIRA, individual,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner John L. Miller appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the
First and Fourteenth Amendments arising out of Miller’s participation in the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Religious Meat Alternative (“RMA”) diet program. We have jurisdiction under