Jesse Graham v. Taylor Swift
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202221-55419California265 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
FEB 25 2022
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESSE GRAHAM, No. 21-55419
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-07000-MWF-GJS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TAYLOR SWIFT, an individual; BIG MACHINE LABEL GROUP LLC, a limited liability company; UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a California Corporation;
KOBALT MUSIC PUBLISHING
AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 15, 2022**
Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Jesse Graham appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his
copyright action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his opening brief, Graham…