Jeffery Kinzle v. Eric Jackson
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 202220-35747California629 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FEB 25 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JEFFERY KINZLE, No. 20-35747
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00703-JCC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ERIC JACKSON,
Respondent-Appellee,
and
STATE OF WASHINGTON; PATRICK
R. GLEBE,
Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 7, 2022 Seattle, Washington
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: BYBEE and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and SELNA,** District Judge.
Petitioner Jeffrey Kinzle seeks relief from the district court’s denial of his
federal habeas petition. Although Kinzle concedes that he was mentally competent
to stand trial and engage in plea negotiations through the duration of proceedings,
he alleges that his trial counsel was deficient for failing to investigate, discover,
and address his mental condition, thereby depriving him of the ability to
intelligently…