People v. Yale CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2022A162470California634 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/28/22 P. v. Yale CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A162470

v. KIMBERLY ANN YALE, (Humboldt County Super. Ct. No. CR2002989C) Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

Defendant Kimberly Ann Yale was convicted on her plea of guilty to being an accessory after the fact to a felony robbery and was placed on probation. (Pen. Code, § 32.) One of the probation conditions required her to submit to warrantless searches of her electronic devices. As the factual basis for the plea, the parties stipulated that Yale drove with two other people to a residence in Arcata, where her two companions, Michelle Odjick and Jason Smith, demanded money from the victim. When the victim refused, Smith…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.