Schrack

Schrack v. Dwyar CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2022D078257California6,642 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Filed 2/28/22 Schrack v. Dwyar CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ANGELA SCHRACK, D078257

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015- EDWARD DWYER, as Successor in 00016808-CU-BC-NC) Interest, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Christine K. Goldsmith, Judge, retired. Affirmed. Iredale and Yoo and Eugene Iredale for Plaintiff and Appellant. Daniel R. Salas for Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff Angela Schrack appeals from the judgment for defendant Edward Dwyer, the successor-in-interest to the Estate of Lee O’Denat, following the grant of summary judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 437c.1 The trial court 2 found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.