United States v. Adam Howell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202221-30187California290 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30187

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-02075-SMJ-

v.

ADAM COLTEN HOWELL, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Salvador Mendoza, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Adam Colten Howell appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the nine-month sentence imposed upon his second revocation of

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Howell contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his housing instability…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.