United States v. Adam Fuller

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202221-10089California1,203 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10089

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00141-KJM-1 v.

ADAM JUSTIN FULLER, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 7, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and ERICKSEN,** District Judge.

Adam Fuller is charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) and (b) by

allegedly striking a federal Court Security Officer at the United States Courthouse

in Sacramento, California. The district court found that Fuller’s schizophrenia

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. renders him incompetent to stand…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.