Richard Stanford v. Kilolo Kijakazi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202219-55389California871 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD G. STANFORD, No. 19-55389

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:17-cv-01781-AG-JEM v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner MEMORANDUM* of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Andrew J. Guilford, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 28, 2022**

Before: D.W. NELSON, BRESS, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BUMATAY.

Richard Stanford appeals pro se the district court’s decision upholding the

Commissioner of Social Security’s decision that he was overpaid and was

ineligible for a waiver of overpayments of supplemental security income (“SSI”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). benefits under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.