Richard Owens v. Natural Emphasis Ltd.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202221-55258California573 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD C. OWENS, DBA Newlight No. 21-55258 Company, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-10512-JFW-KS Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

NATURAL EMPHASIS LTD.; BEAMER

COMPANY; SMOKE HOUSE

DISTRIBUTION INC.; DISCOUNT

SMOKING PRODUCTS INC.; MIQUEL Y

COSTAS AND MIQUEL SA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2022**

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Richard C. Owens appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in his

action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review de novo. Axiom Foods,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.