Di Wang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202220-72854California1,204 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DI WANG, No. 20-72854

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-800-959

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Di Wang, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China,

seeks asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture for herself and her husband because, she asserts, she was forced to undergo

an abortion in 2004 due to China’s family planning policies. After an asylum

interview, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued a Notice of Intent to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Deny (“NOID”) concluding Wang was not entitled to relief because her account of

the forced abortion had too…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.