Brigida Salazar Martinez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202218-71546California574 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 28 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIGIDA MAGDALENA SALAZAR No. 18-71546

MARTINEZ,

Agency No. A209-162-748 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ZIPPS,*** District Judge.

Brigida Magdalena Salazar Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. her appeal challenging the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.