Bonifacio Torres-Hurtado v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 202218-73141California737 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 28 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BONIFACIO TORRES-HURTADO, No. 18-73141

Petitioner, Agency No. A091-760-693

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2022** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and ZIPPS,*** District Judge.

Petitioner Bonifacio Torres-Hurtado (Petitioner) is a native and citizen of

Mexico. He seeks review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the denial of his request for deferral of removal

under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.