SJO Investments v. Riedel CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2022B311943California2,664 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/1/22 SJO Investments v. Riedel CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SJO INVESTMENTS, LLC, B311943

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Los Angeles County Appellant, Super. Ct. No. YC073077)

v.

MICHAEL WAYNE RIEDEL et al.,

Defendants, Cross- complainants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Elden S. Fox, Judge. Affirmed.

The Enochs Law Group, Jon Alan Enochs and Jeffrey D. Poindexter for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant, and Appellant.

Van Antwerp Law Firm and L. Walker Van Antwerp III for Defendants, Cross-complainants, and Respondents. ______________________________ Plaintiff,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.