People v. Medrano CA2/1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2022B314152California79 words
Opinion
Chaney, J.
facts and law; (3) provide a copy of the brief to appellant; and (4) inform the appellant of the right to file a supplemental brief. (Serrano, supra, 211 Cal.App.4th at p. 503, citing Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529, 544 (Ben C.).)
3 [trial court did not have jurisdiction to rule on a motion filed as a post-appeal collateral attack on a judgment under section 1237.2 and Dueñas].
DISPOSITION
The appeal is dismissed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
CHANEY, J.
We concur:
BENDIX, Acting P. J.
CRANDALL, J.*
*Judge of the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
4