People v. Medrano CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 1, 2022B314152California79 words

Opinion

Chaney, J.

facts and law; (3) provide a copy of the brief to appellant; and (4) inform the appellant of the right to file a supplemental brief. (Serrano, supra, 211 Cal.App.4th at p. 503, citing Conservatorship of Ben C. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 529, 544 (Ben C.).)

3 [trial court did not have jurisdiction to rule on a motion filed as a post-appeal collateral attack on a judgment under section 1237.2 and Dueñas].

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

CHANEY, J.

We concur:

BENDIX, Acting P. J.

CRANDALL, J.*

*Judge of the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.

4