People v. Pierson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 2, 2022C093163California2,808 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/2/22 P. v. Pierson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C093163

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 19F1311)

v.

MARLIN JUAN PIERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Marlin Juan Pierson guilty of first degree burglary. The trial court sentenced him to 25 years to life under the Three Strikes law. On appeal, defendant claims his conviction for burglary should be reversed because there was insufficient evidence, independent of accomplice testimony, to tie him to the offense. He also argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss his prior strike conviction under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.