United States v. Jose Granados

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 202220-10289California540 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 2 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10289

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:18-cr-00403-HSG-1 v. 4:18-cr-00403-HSG

JOSE GRANADOS,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2022 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Jose Granados appeals his conviction, following a bench trial, of one count

of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The district court did not err in denying Granados’s motion to suppress

because, considering the totality of the circumstances, see United States v. Burkett,

612 F.3d 1103, 1107 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.