Joe Carlini v. Paramount Pictures Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 202221-55213California1,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOE GREGORY CARLINI, an individual, No. 21-55213

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-08306-SB-RAO v.

PARAMOUNT PICTURES MEMORANDUM*

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; WILL PACKER PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation; BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, a district of Columbia limited liability corporation; TINA GORDON CHISM, an individual; PETER HYUCK, an individual; ALEX GREGORY, an individual; JAS WATERS, an individual; WILL PACKER, an individual; JAMES LOPEZ, an individual; DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 17, 2022 Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District Judge.

Joe Carlini…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.