Jeffery Etter v. Thetford Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 202221-55242California970 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFFERY ETTER, et al., individually and on No. 21-55242 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 8:13-cv-00081-JLS-RNB Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. MEMORANDUM*

NORCOLD, INC., THETFORD

CORPORATION, and THE DYSON-

KISSNER-MORAN CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge

Argued and Submitted February 18, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District Judge.

Defendants-Appellants Norcold, Inc., Thetford Corporation, and the Dyson-

Kissner-Moran Corporation (collectively “Norcold”) seek reversal of the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. court’s post-judgment order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.