Cuker Interactive, LLC v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 202221-55298California1,013 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 2 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: CUKER INTERACTIVE, LLC, No. 21-55298
Debtor, D.C. No. ______________________________ 3:20-cv-01882-CAB-BLM
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
PITTMAN, LLP, MEMORANDUM*
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CUKER INTERACTIVE, LLC,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 18, 2022 Pasadena, California
Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District Judge.
In this adversary proceeding, Cuker Interactive, LLC appeals the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. court’s order finding that the law firm of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw has a…