Cuker Interactive, LLC v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 202221-55298California1,013 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 2 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CUKER INTERACTIVE, LLC, No. 21-55298

Debtor, D.C. No. ______________________________ 3:20-cv-01882-CAB-BLM

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW

PITTMAN, LLP, MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CUKER INTERACTIVE, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 18, 2022 Pasadena, California

Before: BRESS and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK,** District Judge.

In this adversary proceeding, Cuker Interactive, LLC appeals the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. court’s order finding that the law firm of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw has a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.