Marriage of Talebi and Sarvari CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 3/3/22 Marriage of Talebi and Sarvari CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
In re Marriage of FARHAD TALEBI and
AREZOO SARVARI.
FARHAD TALEBI,
G059168
Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 16D002615) v.
OPINION
AREZOO SARVARI,
Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Nathan T. Vu, Judge. Affirmed. Arezoo Savari, in pro. per.; and Holstrom, Block & Parke and Ronald B. Funk for Appellant. The Appellate Law Firm and Berangere Allen-Blaine for Respondent. Appellant Arezoo Sarvari appeals from a judgment dissolving her marriage to Respondent Farhad Talebi, arguing the trial court erred by refusing to consider her evidence on the parties’ date of separation, and by setting the amount of spousal support to zero. We conclude the trial court did not abuse…