Marriage of Talebi and Sarvari CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2022G059168California2,392 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/3/22 Marriage of Talebi and Sarvari CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re Marriage of FARHAD TALEBI and

AREZOO SARVARI.

FARHAD TALEBI,

G059168

Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 16D002615) v.

OPINION

AREZOO SARVARI,

Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Nathan T. Vu, Judge. Affirmed. Arezoo Savari, in pro. per.; and Holstrom, Block & Parke and Ronald B. Funk for Appellant. The Appellate Law Firm and Berangere Allen-Blaine for Respondent. Appellant Arezoo Sarvari appeals from a judgment dissolving her marriage to Respondent Farhad Talebi, arguing the trial court erred by refusing to consider her evidence on the parties’ date of separation, and by setting the amount of spousal support to zero. We conclude the trial court did not abuse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.