United States v. Reuben Mandish

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 3 2022

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30113

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:18-cr-00069-JO-1 3:18-cr-00069-JO v.

REUBEN JAMES MANDISH, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 14, 2021 Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, IKUTA, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge W. FLETCHER.

Reuben James Mandish appeals the district court’s March 21, 2020 amended

restitution order, which imposed an additional $12,000 of restitution under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3663A. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Although due to the government’s oversight the district court missed the 90-

day deadline prescribed by 18 U.S.C. § 3664(d)(5) for imposing…