Mahesh Sital v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 3, 202221-70033California1,074 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 3 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAHESH BHAI SITAL, No. 21-70033

Petitioner, Agency No. A093-446-509

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2022** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN,*** District Judge.

Mahesh Bhai Sital, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions this Court for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. appeal from the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision finding that he filed a

frivolous asylum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.