Yellow Dog Holdings v. Ascentium Capital CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2022G059835California3,369 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/3/22 Yellow Dog Holdings v. Ascentium Capital CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

YELLOW DOG HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.,

Cross-Complainants and Appellants, G059835

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2019-01073663)

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL, LLC, OPINION

Cross-Defendant and Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Melissa R. McCormick, Judge. Reversed. Requests for judicial notice. Denied. Motion to augment. Denied. Carlsen Law Corporation and Miles Carlsen for Cross-Complainants and Appellants. Frandzel Robins Bloom & Csato, Andrew K. Alper and Hal D. Goldflam for Cross-Defendant and Respondent. Cross-complainants,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.