Gonzalez
People v. Gonzalez
Opinion
Opinion
FACTS
Because this case involves a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute,
the underlying facts of Gonzalez’s crime are not relevant. (See Tobe v. City of Santa Ana
(1995) 9 Cal.4th 1069, 1084 (Tobe) [“A facial challenge to the constitutional validity of a
statute or ordinance considers only the text of the measure itself, not its application to the
particular circumstances of an individual”].) For our purposes, it suffices to say Gonzalez
was caught parked on the side of the road with about .6 grams of methamphetamine and a
Unlabeled statutory citations refer to the Health and Safety Code.
2 loaded, operable firearm. He was convicted of three firearm-related crimes (including the
violation of section 11370.1 at issue here) and sentenced to six years in prison.
II
ANALYSIS
Section 11370.1 makes it a felony to possess certain controlled substances “while
armed with a loaded, operable firearm.” (§ 11370.1, subd. (a).) Gonzalez argues this
provision impermissibly infringes on the Second Amendment right to bear arms because
it targets nonviolent criminals—i.e., those in possession of controlled substances. To pass
constitutional scrutiny, Gonzalez…