Pappas

Pappas v. Chang

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2022A159792California9,837 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

The General Setting, the Settlement at Mediation, and the Aftermath In June 2016, Dr. Chang, a board-certified plastic surgeon, performed cosmetic surgery on the upper and lower eyelids of both of Pappas’s eyes, in a procedure technically known as blepharoplasty. In September 2017, represented by attorney Constantine Panagotacos, Pappas made a demand for arbitration, pursuant to the parties’ patient- physician agreement, alleging that Dr. Chang had been negligent in her care and treatment of Pappas. The parties agreed to participate in mediation, which resulted in a settlement agreement signed on June 29, 2018. That agreement, executed by both parties and their attorneys, was 24-lines long, with these five substantive paragraphs: “1. [Dr. Chang] will pay [Pappas] the total sum of $100,000.00. “2. [Pappas] will execute a release of all claims, including waiver of Civil Code [section] 1542, in a more comprehensive settlement agreement and file a Request for Dismissal with Prejudice; said release to include a provision for mutual confidentiality as to the facts of the underlying case, the terms and amount of this agreement. This confidentiality includes, but is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.