Hernandez-Valenzuela

Hernandez-Valenzuela v. Super. Ct.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2022A163992California15,336 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/3/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

OSMIN HERNANDEZ-

VALENZUELA, A163992

Petitioner, (San Francisco City & County v. Super. Ct. No. 21005426)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

ANDRES VALDIVIA TORRES,

Petitioner, v. A163996

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN (San Francisco City & County FRANCISCO, Super. Ct. Nos. 20008445, 21003966) Respondent;

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

1 In these consolidated writ proceedings 1, petitioners Andres Valdivia Torres and Osmin Hernandez-Valenzuela (collectively “petitioners”) each seek a writ of mandate or prohibition requiring respondent Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco to dismiss his case for violating his speedy trial rights under Penal Code section 1382. 2 Petitioners contend there was no good cause to continue their cases past the statutory deadline. We disagree and therefore…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.