People v. Stinson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2022C087504California15,729 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/4/22 P. v. Stinson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

THE PEOPLE, C087504

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CR-

FECOD-2017-0000918)

v.

ANTUAN JERMALE STINSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE PEOPLE, C087504

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CR-

FECOD-2017-0000919)

v.

HAROLD MILES,

Defendant and Appellant.

1 Codefendants Antuan Jermale Stinson and Harold Miles were convicted of the murder and attempted robbery of T.L. (the father), the attempted murder of T.L.’s son (the son), and the killing of T.L.’s dog (the dog). On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.